On 4/28/2015 10:57 PM, Daniel Jones wrote:
Hi (is it Max or Weijun? I don't want to be rude!)
Either is OK.
I've read through the code changes and static analysis with my eyes suggests the change looks good. The client is not in the habit of building OpenJDK regularly, but there's no reason we can't give it a go. I had a look on http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/ and I can't see the changeset anywhere. Is there a specific revision I should be looking for? I'm more familiar with Git than Mercurial, so may be missing something obvious.
It's still in code review and not in dev repo yet. --Max
Cheers! On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Weijun Wang <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On 4/28/2015 6:14 PM, Daniel Jones wrote: I noticed in the bug report Internet Explorer is mentioned. We see the same behaviour with IE, Firefox and Chrome. Thanks. I've mentioned that in the comment. BTW, are you able to build jdk yourself? If so, can you try out the fix? http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8078439/webrev.01/ It applies to both both jdk8u (without the module name in src path) and jdk9. I've done some local tests but it would be more confident if it works for your environment. Thanks Max -- Regards, Daniel Jones EngineerBetter.com
