Well, for Jake repo, it will have to be either Mandy or Sean (Mullan). I
can't push to that repo...
Valerie
On 1/4/2016 1:13 AM, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
Hi Valerie,
If everything looks fine in the current version of webrev then can you please
help me push the changes to JAKE repo.
Thanks,
Siba
-----Original Message-----
From: Wang Weijun
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 2:36 PM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo
Cc: Mandy Chung; Valerie Peng; jigsaw-...@openjdk.java.net; OpenJDK
Subject: Re: [9] RFR:8130360: Add tests to verify 3rd party security providers
if they are in signed/unsigned modular JARs
I have no more comment.
--Max
On Jan 3, 2016, at 3:48 PM, Sibabrata Sahoo<sibabrata.sa...@oracle.com> wrote:
Updated the bug title and description.
Thanks,
Siba
-----Original Message-----
From: Wang Weijun
Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2016 1:02 PM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo
Cc: Mandy Chung; Valerie Peng; jigsaw-...@openjdk.java.net; OpenJDK
Subject: Re: [9] RFR:8130360: Add tests to verify 3rd party security providers
if they are in signed/unsigned modular JARs
Then you don't need to include the "signed/unsigned" words in the bug
description.
--Max
On Jan 3, 2016, at 2:30 PM, Sibabrata Sahoo<sibabrata.sa...@oracle.com> wrote:
Hi Max,
The test is for verifying 3rd party security provider in classpath/modulepath.
I am using an empty provider to check, if the provider can be found during
runtime when the bundle provided through classpath/modulepath with different
modular type combination. As the provider is empty, I think this is unnecessary
to sign the bundle.
Even the same comment[1] was also provided by "Valerie" few days ago and the
comment was addressed with this webrev,
[1] I think it's somewhat misleading to use the term JCE here as what you are
testing here is just security provider loading. JCE is more about security
providers supporting export-controlled services/algorithms. Since your provider
is just an empty one, I don't think u need to sign it (again, it's only for JCE
providers).
Thanks,
Siba
