> On Jan 29, 2016, at 7:48 PM, Seán Coffey <sean.cof...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Since I now reference the JarSignerParameters class directly in 
> TimestampedSigner.java, the compiler was generating a warning. I thought it 
> might be neater to break JarSignerParameters into its own separate class.  

Oh, yes.

> Shall I revert ?

No. It's not a good practice putting 2 top level classes into one file.

Was that the compiler is complaining about?

Thanks
Max


> 
> Regards,
> Sean.
> 
> On 29/01/16 11:42, Wang Weijun wrote:
>> Why did you remove the JarSignerParameters class definition inside 
>> jarsigner/Main.java? Was it duplicated somewhere else?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Max
>> 
>>> On Jan 27, 2016, at 11:09 PM, Seán Coffey <sean.cof...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I'd like to backport this enhancement to JDK 8u. It's been approved via CCC 
>>> process already.
>>> 
>>> The fix differs to that in JDK 9 in that I've chosen not to update the JDK 
>>> 9 deprecated ContentSignerParameters interface. That was a request from Dev 
>>> engineer.
>>> 
>>> For jdk8u, the tSAPolicyID value is obtained from the JarSignerParameters 
>>> class. I've moved that class to its own source file. Build and tests are 
>>> green.
>>> 
>>> webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.8038837.8u/webrev/
>>> bug report : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038837
>>> -- 
>>> Regards,
>>> Sean.
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to