> On Jan 29, 2016, at 7:48 PM, Seán Coffey <sean.cof...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Since I now reference the JarSignerParameters class directly in > TimestampedSigner.java, the compiler was generating a warning. I thought it > might be neater to break JarSignerParameters into its own separate class.
Oh, yes. > Shall I revert ? No. It's not a good practice putting 2 top level classes into one file. Was that the compiler is complaining about? Thanks Max > > Regards, > Sean. > > On 29/01/16 11:42, Wang Weijun wrote: >> Why did you remove the JarSignerParameters class definition inside >> jarsigner/Main.java? Was it duplicated somewhere else? >> >> Thanks >> Max >> >>> On Jan 27, 2016, at 11:09 PM, Seán Coffey <sean.cof...@oracle.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'd like to backport this enhancement to JDK 8u. It's been approved via CCC >>> process already. >>> >>> The fix differs to that in JDK 9 in that I've chosen not to update the JDK >>> 9 deprecated ContentSignerParameters interface. That was a request from Dev >>> engineer. >>> >>> For jdk8u, the tSAPolicyID value is obtained from the JarSignerParameters >>> class. I've moved that class to its own source file. Build and tests are >>> green. >>> >>> webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.8038837.8u/webrev/ >>> bug report : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038837 >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Sean. >>> >