Re: JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8151763; Use more informative format for problem list

[joe darcy]

On 3/30/2016 5:34 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Mar 30, 2016, at 4:48 PM, Joseph D. Darcy <joe.da...@oracle.com> wrote:
Hi Mandy,

Hopefully the third time will be the charm for this changeset after your 
correction to the commented-out test:

    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8151763.2

I aligned the bug number in column 64 unless the test name took more 
characters. (This isn't as evident in the webrev since the tab expansion is 
different than in a text editor.)

Thanks for doing it.  Looks fine with me.

Just to mention it: these few lines are somewhat strange (shorter test name has 
more whitespace) that you may want to double check.  Ok to push what you have.

! java/nio/file/WatchService/Basic.java                                       
7158947 solaris-all Solaris 11
! java/nio/file/WatchService/MayFlies.java                                    
7158947 solaris-all Solaris 11
! java/nio/file/WatchService/LotsOfEvents.java                            
7158947 solaris-all Solaris 11


Pushed after a de-tabbification and verifying the set of tests to run 
was the same before and after the update.

Thanks,

-Joe