Change looks fine. Thanks Max
> 在 2016年6月24日，18:26，Xuelei Fan <[email protected]> 写道： > >> On 6/24/2016 9:15 AM, Wang Weijun wrote: >> Looks fine. >> >> Only one thing uncertain: Since com.sun.* is not a part of Java SE, maybe >> you should write "This class is subject to removal in a future version of >> JDK". > Updated in the new webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8157712/webrev.01/ > >> Also, since it's forRemoval, you can file another RFE targeting jdk10 for >> the actual removal. > A new RFE was filed: > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8160247 > > Thanks, > Xuelei > >> Thanks >> Max >> >> >>> On Jun 24, 2016, at 7:33 AM, Xuelei Fan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Please review this update for JDK 9: >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8157712/webrev.00/ >>> >>> See http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/277 for details of the enhanced >>> deprecation annotation. >>> >>> The JCE provider "com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.Provider" would be >>> deprecated since JDK 9, too. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Xuelei >
