> On Jul 7, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Alan Bateman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 07/07/2016 09:27, Wang Weijun wrote:
>
>> Like this?
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/wangweij/6992aaf9617b9e2f242ddf9e391ea5f6
>>
>> The horizontal line is printed on line 706 of the gist.
>>
> I assume the suggestion was to reference SQLPermission before setting the
> security manager. As regards module loading then we can re-wording this
> specific case but fundamentally then anything in the checkPermission
> implementation that triggers a permission check is going to lead to a
> recursive call to checkPermission.
If I add a "new SQLPermission("setLog");" at the beginning, then there will be
no exception thrown.
The stack trace does show the issue arise from resolving SQLPermission.
Peter says "all necessary classes are loaded", and I thought it's about the
access control things.
--Max
>
> -Alan
