A recently added test case lacks sufficient permissions to read a conf
file when running with security manager.
bug report : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8162916
proposed patch :
diff --git a/test/sun/security/krb5/auto/unbound.ssl.policy
b/test/sun/security/krb5/auto/unbound.ssl.policy
--- a/test/sun/security/krb5/auto/unbound.ssl.policy
+++ b/test/sun/security/krb5/auto/unbound.ssl.policy
@@ -1,7 +1,13 @@
+// Standard extensions get all permissions by default
+
+grant codeBase "file:${{java.ext.dirs}}/*" {
+ permission java.security.AllPermission;
+};
+
grant {
permission java.util.PropertyPermission "*", "read,write";
permission java.net.SocketPermission "*:*",
"listen,resolve,accept,connect";
- permission java.io.FilePermission "*", "read,write,delete";
+ permission java.io.FilePermission "<<ALL FILES>>", "read,write,delete";
permission java.lang.RuntimePermission "accessDeclaredMembers";
permission java.lang.reflect.ReflectPermission "suppressAccessChecks";
permission java.lang.RuntimePermission "accessClassInPackage.*";
--
Regards,
Sean.
