I looked at the code a while back. The implementation looks good but very complicated. I'm not very sure if the performance benefit really worthy it. I may just simplify it to use temporary buffer if the input and output buffer shares the array. So I was hesitated ...

However, as you are already there, it may not worthy to re-write the fix as well. ;-) So, it's good to me to have it now. Please go ahead.

Thanks,
Xuelei


On 7/8/2019 5:24 PM, Valerie Peng wrote:
Ping...

May defer this to 14 if no one has cycles to review it.

Thanks,
Valerie
On 6/14/2019 5:19 PM, Valerie Peng wrote:


Anyone can help review this fix on ByteBuffer input/output encryption?

The fix should be self-explanatory with the comments.

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181386

Webrev:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/8181386/webrev.00/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/8181386/webrev.00/>

Mach5 run is clean.

Thanks,
Valerie

Reply via email to