Yes, we got agreement from all parties.

Vladimir

On 8/14/19 10:44 AM, Deshpande, Vivek R wrote:
Hi Vladimir

Can I sponsor and push the patch since you and  Valerie have reviewed the patch?

Regards,

Vivek

*From:*Valerie Peng [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* Friday, August 2, 2019 5:09 PM
*To:* Vladimir Kozlov <[email protected]>; Rukmannagari, Shravya <[email protected]>; Kamath, Smita <[email protected]>; 'Anthony Scarpino' <[email protected]> *Cc:* OpenJDK Security <[email protected]>; Viswanathan, Sandhya <[email protected]>; Deshpande, Vivek R <[email protected]>; Shemy, Regev <[email protected]> *Subject:* Re: RFR(S) JDK-8225625: AES Electronic Codebook (ECB) encryption and decryption optimizations using AVX512 + VAES instructions.

Changes to the ElectronicCodeBook.java looks fine to me.

Thanks,

Valerie

On 7/31/2019 2:38 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:

    Good. Lets wait review from security team.

    Thank you
    Vladimir

    On 7/31/19 2:20 PM, Rukmannagari, Shravya wrote:

        Hi Vladimir,
        Thanks a lot for the review. I have responded to the JBS bug with the 
use cases for ECB. Please find the updated
        webrev with no changes to the config file.
        http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vdeshpande/AES-ECB/webrev.02/

        Thanks,
        Shravya.

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Vladimir Kozlov [mailto:[email protected]]
        Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2019 3:31 PM
        To: Rukmannagari, Shravya <[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>; Kamath,
        Smita <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>; 'Anthony 
Scarpino' <[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        Cc: Viswanathan, Sandhya <[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>; Deshpande,
        Vivek R <[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>; 'hotspot compiler'
        <[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>; Shemy, Regev
        <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>; OpenJDK Security 
<[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        Subject: Re: RFR(S) JDK-8225625: AES Electronic Codebook (ECB) 
encryption and decryption optimizations using
        AVX512 + VAES instructions.

        CCing to security-dev since you touched their class.

        Please answer Sean's question in the bug report.

        I don't think .jcheck/conf change should be part of this.

        Thanks,
        Vladimir

        On 7/23/19 1:44 PM, Rukmannagari, Shravya wrote:

            Hi Vladimir,
            I have updated the patch as per your suggestions. The JMH test
            test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/javax/crypto/full/AESBench.java has 
been
            modified to add support for different key lengths. Please take a 
look
            and let me know if you have any questions or comments.
            http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vdeshpande/AES-ECB/webrev.01/

            Thanks,
            Shravya.

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Rukmannagari, Shravya
            Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 7:52 AM
            To: Vladimir Kozlov <[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>; Kamath, Smita
            <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>; 'Anthony 
Scarpino'
            <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
            Cc: Viswanathan, Sandhya <[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>; Deshpande,
            Vivek R <[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>; 'hotspot compiler'
            <[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>; Shemy, Regev
            <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
            Subject: RE: RFR(S) JDK-8225625: AES Electronic Codebook (ECB) 
encryption and decryption optimizations using
            AVX512 + VAES instructions.

            Hi Vladimir,
            For checking the correctness, we have run the 
hotspot/jtreg/compiler/codegen/aes/TestAESMain.java and the
            entire jtreg test suite. For the JMH benchmark tests,
            test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/javax/crypto/full/AESBench.java tests 
ECB for a key length of 128. I will
            extend the test for other key lengths and send out an updated patch.

            Thanks,
            Shravya.

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Vladimir Kozlov [mailto:[email protected]]
            Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2019 4:02 PM
            To: Kamath, Smita <[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>; 'Anthony Scarpino'
            <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
            Cc: Viswanathan, Sandhya <[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>;
            Rukmannagari, Shravya <[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>; Deshpande,
            Vivek R <[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>; 'hotspot compiler'
            <[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>; Shemy, Regev
            <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
            Subject: Re: RFR(S) JDK-8225625: AES Electronic Codebook (ECB) 
encryption and decryption optimizations using
            AVX512 + VAES instructions.

            Hi Smita

            I looked on changes and they seem fine in general (mostrly 
copy/past of cipherBlockChaining code).

            Few comments:

            Don't use _AVX3 in macroasm method names because you have only 
avx512 implementation.

            Indentions are bad in inline_electronicCodeBook_AESCrypt().

            Add test to check results of optimization.

            Would be nice to have JMH test to see performance benefits.

            You also need to add checks to Graal's test [1] to prevent failure 
until this intrinsic is implemented in
            Graal.

            Thanks,
            Vladimir

            [1]
            
src/jdk.internal.vm.compiler/share/classes/org.graalvm.compiler.hotspo
            
t.test/src/org/graalvm/compiler/hotspot/test/CheckGraalIntrinsics.java

            On 6/26/19 4:27 PM, Kamath, Smita wrote:

                Hi All,

                Could you please review AES-ECB implemented using AVX512+VAES 
instructions.

                Thanks and Regards,

                Smita Kamath

                *From:* Kamath, Smita
                *Sent:* Tuesday, June 11, 2019 4:23 PM
                *To:* 'Vladimir Kozlov' <[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>; Anthony
                Scarpino <[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>
                *Cc:* Viswanathan, Sandhya <[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>; Shravya
                Rukmannagari
                ([email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>)
                <[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>;
                hotspot compiler <[email protected]> 
<mailto:[email protected]>;
                Shemy,
                Regev <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
                *Subject:* RFR(S) JDK-8225625: AES Electronic Codebook (ECB)
                encryption and decryption optimizations using AVX512 + VAES 
instructions.

                Hi Vladimir,

                As per Intel Architecture Instruction Set Reference [1] Vector 
AES
                Encrypt and Decrypt Operations will be supported in future 
Intel ISA.
                We would like to contribute optimizations for AES-ECB algorithm 
to
                support encryption and decryption operations using AVX512+VAES 
instructions. These optimizations are for
                x86_64 architecture that have AVX512-VAES enabled.

                Shravya(cc'ed) and I are co-contributors. Shay
                Gueron([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>) 
and Regev Shemy
                ([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>) 
are the authors of the algorithm.

                I have tested the algorithm with Intel SDE [2] to confirm 
encoding
                and semantics are correctly implemented.

                Please take a look and let me know if you have any questions or 
comments.

                http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vdeshpande/AES-ECB/webrev.00/

                Bug Id: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225625

                [1]
                
https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/ad/01/253666-s
                d
                m-vol-2a.pdf  (Page 152 - 159)

                [2]
                
https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-software-development-
                e
                mulator

                Regards,

                Smita Kamath

Reply via email to