CertStatusExtension.java
------------------------
1239             // The consuming happens in server side only.
typo? server -> client

It wold be nice to add a debug log that this extension get ignored. But may not need to define this consumer as it is not supported.

SSLExtension.java
-----------------
As this fix does not implement this feature yet, is it possible to just define it without the on-load consumer?

Otherwise, it looks fine to me.

BTW, this issue reminders me a common problem: if an extension is supported in a handshake message, we need to know all other handshake messages that could use the extension, and define an SSLExtension enum for them. Otherwise, a similar issue could happen. I think it would be challenge to know that in practice.

So I was just wondering, could we just release the check in the SSLExtensions.java implementation (from line 71 to 95)? If the extension for the specific handshake type is not defined, just ignore it, except for ServerHello? I think the behavior complies to the TLS 1.3 protocol.

if (SSLExtension.isConsumable(extId) &&
    SSLExtension.valueOf(handshakeType, extId) == null) {
    ...
-   } else {
+   } else if (handshakeType == SSLHandshake.SERVER_HELLO) {
        throw hm.handshakeContext.conContext.fatal(
              Alert.UNSUPPORTED_EXTENSION,
              "extension (" + extId +
              ") should not be presented in " + handshakeType.name);
+   } else {
+       isSupported = false;
+       // debug log to ignore unknown extension for handshakeType
    }
}

Xuelei

On 1/3/2020 10:06 AM, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
Hi All, the golang folks have been running into an issue where our JSSE client treats the status_request extension in a CertificateRequest message from a golang server as an unknown extension and alerts.  This quick fix will allow the client to read and accept the extension and proceed.  I believe you need golang 1.13.x to see this take place.

This fix does not implement client-side OCSP stapling.  That will be an RFE for another day.

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8236039

Webrev: https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jnimeh/reviews/8236039/webrev.01/

--Jamil

Reply via email to