Hello,

Could you please review new version of the patch:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~abakhtin/8245527/webrev.v3/

I’ve moved all logic for creating TLS Channel Binding data out of  
GssKrb5Client.java file.
All data is prepared inside TlsChannelBinding class.
Internal property name is renamed to “com.sun.security.sasl.tlschannelbinding”.
TlsChannelBinding object is still used to pass channel binding data from 
LdapClient to GssKrb5Client.
I do not change it to byte[] because of TlsChannelBinding class is still used 
for internal property name.
Also, I’ve updated TlsChannelBinding class to select SHA-256 hash algorithm if 
it can not be derived
from the certificate signature name.

Regards
Alexey


> On 26 May 2020, at 17:50, Weijun Wang <weijun.w...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> I have a question on GssKrb5Client.java:
> 
> Do you think it's a good idea to let the SASL mechanism understand what TLS 
> binding is? Instead of passing the whole TlsChannelBinding object through a 
> SASL property, is it possible to only pass the actual cbData? After all, the 
> name "com.sun.security.sasl.channelbinding" suggests it's just a general 
> ChannelBinding which is independent with any application level info.
> 
> From my reading of the code change, it looks like this cbData can be 
> calculated on the LDAP side.
> 
> Thanks,
> Max
> 
>> On May 21, 2020, at 3:35 PM, Alexey Bakhtin <ale...@azul.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Could you please review the following patch:
>> 
>> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8245527
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~abakhtin/8245527/webrev.v0/
>> 
>> The Windows LDAP server with LdapEnforceChannelBinding=2 uses the 
>> tls-server-end-point channel binding
>> (based on the TLS server certificate). The channel binding data is 
>> calculated as following :
>>      • The client calculates a hash of the TLS server certificate.
>>          The hash algorithm is selected on the base of the certificate 
>> signature algorithm.
>>          Also, the client should use SHA-256 algorithm, in case of the 
>> certificate signature algorithm is SHA1 or MD5 based
>>      • The channel binding information is the same as defined in rfc4121 [1] 
>> with small corrections:
>>              • initiator and acceptor addresses should be set to NULL
>>              • initiator and acceptor address types should be zero.
>>                 It contradicts to the “Using Channel Bindings in GSS-API” 
>> document [2] that say that
>>                 the address type should be set to GSS_C_AF_NULLADDR=0xFF,
>>                 instead of GSS_C_AF_UNSPEC=0x00.
>> 
>> This patch introduces changes in the LDAP, SASL and JGSS modules
>> to generate channel binding data automatically if requested by an 
>> application.
>> This patch reuses existing org.ietf.jgss.ChannelBinding class implementation 
>> but changes
>> initial unspecified address type from CHANNEL_BINDING_AF_NULL_ADDR to 
>> CHANNEL_BINDING_AF_UNSPEC.
>> The patch introduces new environment property “com.sun.jndi.ldap.tls.cbtype” 
>> that indicates
>> Channel Binding type that should be used in the LDAPS connection over 
>> JGSS/Kerberos.
>> Right now "tls-server-end-point" Channel Binding type is supported only.
>> The client extracts server certificate from the underlying TLS connection 
>> and creates
>> Channel Binding data for JGSS/Kerberos authentication if application 
>> indicates
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.tls.cbtype=tls-server-end-point property.
>> Client application should also specify existing 
>> "com.sun.jndi.ldap.connect.timeout” property
>> to force and wait TLS handshake completion before JGSS/Kerberos 
>> authentication data is generated.
>> 
>> [1] - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4121#section-4.1.1.2
>> 
>> [2] -
>> https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19120-01/open.solaris/819-2145/overview-52/index.html
>> 
>> Initial discussion of this issue is available at security-dev list:
>> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2019-December/021052.html
>> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2020-January/021140.html
>> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2020-February/021278.html
>> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2020-May/021864.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Reply via email to