On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 13:18:30 GMT, Jim Laskey <jlas...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> I am unsure if the intent is also to support external libraries providing 
>> `RandomGenerator` implementations. Currently there is an implicit contract 
>> for properties (reflectively invoking a method returning a map with a set of 
>> entries with known keys). Since the service provider implementation is the 
>> `RandomGenerator` itself, rather than `RandomGeneratorFactory` it is harder 
>> expose the meta-data with a clearer contract.
>
> Need rebase

Created new PR because of forced push: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/1292

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1273

Reply via email to