On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 13:18:30 GMT, Jim Laskey <jlas...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I am unsure if the intent is also to support external libraries providing >> `RandomGenerator` implementations. Currently there is an implicit contract >> for properties (reflectively invoking a method returning a map with a set of >> entries with known keys). Since the service provider implementation is the >> `RandomGenerator` itself, rather than `RandomGeneratorFactory` it is harder >> expose the meta-data with a clearer contract. > > Need rebase Created new PR because of forced push: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/1292 ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1273