On 10/06/2021 03:49, Peter Firmstone wrote:
Hi Sean,
Sorry I've confused you.
What I should have said is a ProtectionDomain with a null CodeSource.
What I mean to ask is, where ProtectionDomain is created with a null
CodeSource, in Class::getProtectionDomain() can we have CodeSource's
that represents system modules instead of null?
A CodeSource with URL's like jrt:/jdk.* or jrt:/java.* for system
modules?
This is already the case for system modules that are mapped to the
platform or application class loaders. I think your question is about
modules that are mapped to the boot loader and whether they should get a
unique PD that includes a useful code source rather than using a
"shared" PD. That would be changing long standing behavior and would
require careful analysis to see if anything would break.
-Alan
