On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 14:48:08 GMT, Martin Balao <mba...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Not adding the type is OK, I said it's just to be a little clearer. I think >> you're right about the cname. It's always the one that actually sends the >> request. >> >> What is "the TGS" (in "the TGS is the one")? `clientSvcTicketEnc`? BTW, is >> "client service ticket" a well known name? or we can name it >> "user"-something? > > The TGS in "the TGS is the one" is clientSvcTicketEnc indeed. I admit that > all these names are a bit confusing -but so it is the underlying protocol-. > I'll take the 'user" suggestion and rename it to userSvcTicketEnc -in the > hopes of suggesting some similarity between S4U2Proxy and S4U2Self and make > it more clear-. Agree? Good! No more comment. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5036
