On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:52:27 GMT, Weijun Wang <wei...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> If so, should the `SupportedVersionsExtension` get a more precise
>>> description as well?
>>
>> I did not get the point. Did you mean to update the comment on the
>> SupportedVersionsExtension, by adding RFC 8446?
>
> No, I just meant updating `""versions": '['{0}']'"` to `""supported
> versions": '['{0}']'"` there.
I looked through SupportedGroupsExtension.java and found many examples, like
the followings,
> no supported named group specified
the supported named groups
contains no supported named groups
No default named groups
Ignore inactive or disabled named group
... ...
so I finally used "named groups".
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7123
