On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 03:38:52 GMT, Joe Wang <jo...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> I suspect the `size*2+1` was a failed attempt at allocating a HashMap of >>> the correct capacity for `size` mappings. >> >> I looked the codes and don't think so.. >> If I'm wrong, I'm glad to fix. > > Stuart's right, I looked at the code, it's as you said a failed attempt, > "size" would be good. So HashMap.newHashMap(size) would actually be a small > improvement. > > It's an interesting impl the way it used HashMap, but it's 20 year code. @JoeWang-Java @stuart-marks got it. done. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7928
