On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 17:58:36 GMT, Volodymyr Paprotski <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Handcrafted x86_64 asm for Poly1305. Main optimization is to process 16 
>> message blocks at a time. For more details, left a lot of comments in 
>> `macroAssembler_x86_poly.cpp`.
>> 
>> - Added new KAT test for Poly1305 and a fuzz test to compare intrinsic and 
>> java.
>>   - Would like to add an `InvalidKeyException` in `Poly1305.java` (see 
>> commented out block in that file), but that conflicts with the KAT. I do 
>> think we should detect (R==0 || S ==0) so would like advice please.
>> - Added a JMH perf test.
>>    - JMH test had to use reflection (instead of existing `MacBench.java`), 
>> since Poly1305 is not 'properly' registered with the provider.
>> 
>> Perf before:
>> 
>> Benchmark                   (dataSize)  (provider)   Mode  Cnt        Score  
>>       Error  Units
>> Poly1305DigestBench.digest          64              thrpt    8  2961300.661 
>> ± 110554.162  ops/s
>> Poly1305DigestBench.digest         256              thrpt    8  1791912.962 
>> ±  86696.037  ops/s
>> Poly1305DigestBench.digest        1024              thrpt    8   637413.054 
>> ±  14074.655  ops/s
>> Poly1305DigestBench.digest       16384              thrpt    8    48762.991 
>> ±    390.921  ops/s
>> Poly1305DigestBench.digest     1048576              thrpt    8      769.872 
>> ±      1.402  ops/s
>> 
>> and after:
>> 
>> Benchmark                   (dataSize)  (provider)   Mode  Cnt        Score  
>>       Error  Units
>> Poly1305DigestBench.digest          64              thrpt    8  2841243.668 
>> ± 154528.057  ops/s
>> Poly1305DigestBench.digest         256              thrpt    8  1662003.873 
>> ±  95253.445  ops/s
>> Poly1305DigestBench.digest        1024              thrpt    8  1770028.718 
>> ± 100847.766  ops/s
>> Poly1305DigestBench.digest       16384              thrpt    8   765547.287 
>> ±  25883.825  ops/s
>> Poly1305DigestBench.digest     1048576              thrpt    8    14508.458 
>> ±     56.147  ops/s
>
> Volodymyr Paprotski has updated the pull request with a new target base due 
> to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 23 commits:
> 
>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into avx512-poly
>  - Vladimir's review
>  - live review with Sandhya
>  - jcheck
>  - Sandhya's review
>  - fix windows and 32b linux builds
>  - add getLimbs to interface and reviews
>  - fix 32-bit build
>  - make UsePolyIntrinsics option diagnostic
>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into avx512-poly
>  - ... and 13 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/e269dc03...a26ac7db

src/hotspot/share/opto/library_call.cpp line 6976:

> 6974: 
> 6975:   if (!stubAddr) return false;
> 6976:   Node* input = argument(1);

Receiver null check is missing. Since the method being intrinsified is 
non-static, the intrinsic itself has to take care of receiver null check.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10582

Reply via email to