On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 20:42:27 GMT, Volodymyr Paprotski <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Handcrafted x86_64 asm for Poly1305. Main optimization is to process 16 >> message blocks at a time. For more details, left a lot of comments in >> `macroAssembler_x86_poly.cpp`. >> >> - Added new KAT test for Poly1305 and a fuzz test to compare intrinsic and >> java. >> - Would like to add an `InvalidKeyException` in `Poly1305.java` (see >> commented out block in that file), but that conflicts with the KAT. I do >> think we should detect (R==0 || S ==0) so would like advice please. >> - Added a JMH perf test. >> - JMH test had to use reflection (instead of existing `MacBench.java`), >> since Poly1305 is not 'properly' registered with the provider. >> >> Perf before: >> >> Benchmark (dataSize) (provider) Mode Cnt Score >> Error Units >> Poly1305DigestBench.digest 64 thrpt 8 2961300.661 >> ± 110554.162 ops/s >> Poly1305DigestBench.digest 256 thrpt 8 1791912.962 >> ± 86696.037 ops/s >> Poly1305DigestBench.digest 1024 thrpt 8 637413.054 >> ± 14074.655 ops/s >> Poly1305DigestBench.digest 16384 thrpt 8 48762.991 >> ± 390.921 ops/s >> Poly1305DigestBench.digest 1048576 thrpt 8 769.872 >> ± 1.402 ops/s >> >> and after: >> >> Benchmark (dataSize) (provider) Mode Cnt Score >> Error Units >> Poly1305DigestBench.digest 64 thrpt 8 2841243.668 >> ± 154528.057 ops/s >> Poly1305DigestBench.digest 256 thrpt 8 1662003.873 >> ± 95253.445 ops/s >> Poly1305DigestBench.digest 1024 thrpt 8 1770028.718 >> ± 100847.766 ops/s >> Poly1305DigestBench.digest 16384 thrpt 8 765547.287 >> ± 25883.825 ops/s >> Poly1305DigestBench.digest 1048576 thrpt 8 14508.458 >> ± 56.147 ops/s > > Volodymyr Paprotski has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: > > remove early return @robcasloz Update to [JDK-8297417](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8297417) (since I don't have an account on the bugtracker yet to update there) Not able to reproduce it on Linux yet. The seed should make it deterministic.. but nothing. Resurrecting's my windows sandbox to see if I can reproduce on windows (only difference on windows is the intrinsic function register linkage. However problem there would make the problem _very_ deterministic.. I think) ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10582
