On Mon, 12 May 2025 19:19:32 GMT, Sean Mullan <mul...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I'm assuming there is no more issues here. > > There is still a small issue. On line 228, a clone of the array is now being > done when it doesn't have to. The previous code called the internal > `getArrayS0` method which did not do a clone. ok ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17543#discussion_r2086276989
