On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 16:02:05 GMT, Artur Barashev <[email protected]> wrote:

> [JDK-8349583](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8349583) implementation 
> assumes that OpenJDK client always sends "signature_algorithms_cert" 
> extension together with "signature_algorithms" extension. But we didn't 
> account for `jdk.tls.client.disableExtensions` and 
> `jdk.tls.server.disableExtensions` system properties which can disable 
> producing "signature_algorithms_cert" extension. This is an issue similar to 
> [JDK-8355779](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8355779) but on the 
> extension producing side.
> 
> Per TLSv1.3 RFC:
> 
>>  If no "signature_algorithms_cert" extension is
>>    present, then the "signature_algorithms" extension also applies to
>>    signatures appearing in certificates.
> 
> Also making a few cosmetic changes to the existing code.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 569e7808
Author:    Artur Barashev <[email protected]>
URL:       
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/569e78080b3c25c95d85e9e194626f95f86b9b10
Stats:     569 lines in 7 files changed: 516 ins; 33 del; 20 mod

8365820: Apply certificate scope constraints to algorithms in 
"signature_algorithms" extension when "signature_algorithms_cert" extension is 
not being sent

Reviewed-by: hchao

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26887

Reply via email to