On Sat, 4 Oct 2025 10:29:33 GMT, Bernd <[email protected]> wrote: >> No, the choise to knock out ffdhe6144 and 8192 from the default list was >> done on purpose. I don't think they get much use and they can always be >> re-enabled via SSLParameters or the system property. We're open to feedback >> on this if you or others feel like they should remain in place, though. > > The change is I think ok, doesn’t make much of a difference for most cases I > was just thinking it needed its own commit and ticket reference but if it was > intentional fine as well.
I think you make a fair point here. It probably deserves its own change, JBS entry, CSR, etc. We'll leave them in for now. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27614#discussion_r2404493866
