On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 17:22:25 GMT, Anthony Scarpino <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi >> >> Please review the [Second Preview](https://openjdk.org/jeps/8360563) for the >> PEM API. The most significant changes from [JEP >> 470](https://openjdk.org/jeps/470) are: >> >> - Renamed the name of `PEMRecord` class to `PEM`. >> - Revised the new `encryptKey` methods of the `EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo` >> class to accept `DEREncodable` objects rather than just `PrivateKey` objects >> so that cryptographic objects with public keys, i.e., `KeyPair` and >> `PKCS8EncodedKeySpec`, can also be encrypted. >> - Enhanced the `PEMEncoder` and `PEMDecoder` classes to support the >> encryption and decryption of `KeyPair` and `PKCS8EncodedKeySpec` objects. >> >> thanks >> >> Tony > > Anthony Scarpino has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: > > updates src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/PEMDecoder.java line 84: > 82: * <li>ENCRYPTED PRIVATE KEY : {@code PublicKey} (If configured with > 83: * decryption, the encoding contains a public key, and is passed as a > 84: * {@code Class} parameter)</li> If it can be decoded into `PublicKey` then it can also be decoded into an `X509EncodedKeySpec`. Shall we create sub-bullets or even a table to describe different outputs for the same type? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27147#discussion_r2448820835
