Dittmann Werner wrote:
Vishal, BerinI looked at the code again and don't think it's happening this way. Only a replace child operation is being done (all child nodes are not being removed). I am looking at the XMLCipher.decryptElement() method.
during some encrypt/decrypt tests with signature:
This is mainly a problem for "content" mode encryption.
AFAIK, during encryption XMLCipher creates a document fragment
with the content, serializes and encrypts it. Decryption
is reverse. After decryption XMLCipher first removes
(or shall remove) all child-nodes of the element e.g. CreditCard, then puts in the nodes of the document fragment (effectivly restores the original content).
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks,
Vishal
Thus, IMHO, there is no problem with Signature/Encrypt. During our test we already did tests signature/encryption in content mode.
Regards, Werner
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Vishal Mahajan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. Februar 2004 08:35
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Problem in Decryption
Hi Berin,
I agree with your reading of the spec. But, the spec does not prevent the encrypter from putting whitespaces between the tags of EncryptedData and its parent node. Also there are example encrypted documents like the following in the spec:
<EncryptedData xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#' Type='http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#Content'> <CipherData> <CipherValue>A23B45C56</CipherValue> </CipherData> </EncryptedData>
Other thing to note is that if the document was signed prior to encryption, the signature verification would fail. I think this is an important interop issue. What do you think?
Thanks, Vishal
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Vishal,node, even
I ran accross this when I was doing the checks for the Merlin Interop
examples - which have white space prior to the EncryptedData
when that node is of type "element content". According tothe spec (from
EncryptedDatasection 4.2) : #####################################
"The decryptor SHOULD support the ability to replace the
element with the decrypted 'element' or element 'content'represented by
the UTF-8 encoded characters. The decryptor is NOT REQUIREDto perform
the C++ andvalidation on the result of this replacement operation." ######################################
The key words for me were in the first sentance - "...replace the
EncryptedData element with the decrypted 'element' or element
'content'...".
There is no mention of the parent of the EncryptedData, or any of the
surrounding nodes, so my reading is that the libraries (both
XMLCipherJava libraries have this behaviour) are doing the correct thing. Happy to be corrected if someone can find something else in the spec!
Cheers, Berin
Hi All,
I think there is a problem in the decryption process of the
EncryptedData and itsclass. To put the problem across, here's my question:
If there is some whitespace between the tags of
Should I alsoparent (See the example below) and the Type attribute of the EncryptedData corresponds to "element content", then the current implementation simply replaces the EncryptedData with the decrypted DocumentFragment. Shouldn't it first remove the existing contents (whitespace, etc) of the parent node of EncryptedData and then do an appendChild(DocumentFragment) on the parent?
<CreditCard Limit='5,000' Currency='USD'> <EncryptedData xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#' Type='http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#Content'> <CipherData> <CipherValue>A23B45C56</CipherValue> </CipherData> </EncryptedData> </CreditCard>
If this is accepted as a bug, I even have a patch for it.
raise a bugzilla?
Thanks,
Vishal