> Last patch wasn't soo spectacular, but the first second to last was
> pretty good again. Got a build on my laptop from 14.11 to 11.41 :-)
> I was working on the laptop, so results aren't too reliable though.
>
Thank you.
>> That is my last easy patch, I will try to go inside
>> Canonicalizer20010315Excl because is more or less the 80% of the time
>> of my execution. If anyone has some idea of what to look for, please
>> tell me.
>
> I have taken quite a few big looks at C14N trying to speed it up, but
> it's amazingly complex. I think the only way to get some real speed
> improvements is by redesigning the algorithm, but I don't even know if
> that's feasible :)
>
> I have tried to code with proper final declarations and keeping object
> generation out of loops, but that didn't knock anything decent off, so
> I reverted the code as it was even more unreadable afterwards.
>
I have refactor the c14XPathNodeSet so it isn�t recursive, I haven�t see
neither speed increase nor decrease(and that�s weird becouse I use
java.util.Stack instead of the java own stack). But now i can let the
jrat(jrat.sf.net) to profile more acurately.When I see some minor speed up(1sec over
14sec) is in changing the:
void outputAttrToWriter(String name, String value) throws IOException {
this._writer.write(" ");
this._writer.write(name);
this._writer.write("=\"");
int length = value.length();
char[] c=value.toCharArray();
for (int i = 0; i < length; i++) {
//Use the array index instedof getCharAt(i)
switch (c[i]) {
But i wait till to submit the patch till i have a better picture of what
to change.
Other things that I will try is changing the ByteArrayOutputStream to a
StringBuffer, just for the shake of change.But i think all the changes will be very
JVM dependent or something like
this.
> The other thing is that I don't want to introduce too major changes in
> this version. Ideally the big changes will happen in the next version,
> which shouldn't take too long anymore.. (Yes I am aware I have been
> saying that for months.. I always underestimate the desire for
> bureaucracy in big companies ;-) )
>
I think so, Something as big as a rework c14n must be postpone to the next
release.
Raul
