Jonathan Schleifer wrote: > Jonathan Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> (compared to making >> a new standard which would have no implementations). > > ESessions *HAS* implementations! That's the point I bring up again > and again against reinventing the wheel and doing something with TLS > now!
One point is that we may also have serverless messaging. In that case we already open a new stream and get TLS for free. The idea was to have one way for both serverless and server based messaging. > Now you're even talk about breaking XMPP Core compatibility? He wrote that when we would update client-server communication. Let us do that someday else. :) Right now we only need client to client encryption. That does not involve any core changes. > And libotr can't handle arbitrary data, just messages. And out. I need iq stanzas to be encrypted, too. Everything else is useless for me. In fact, 90% of the data I plan to send are iq stanzas. > For which it will add HTML escapes if it's plaintext. And out again. The last 10% I will use for messages are more or less just pubsub messages. HTML does not belong there. Yes, I plan to use client to client pubsub. Dirk -- And on the seventh day, He exited from append mode.
