Pedro Melo wrote: > I think you should list all that have a chance of completing > successfully. If my client support GPG but I didn't gave it my key, he > should not announce it. > > And yes, as along as no personal, per-user information is sent on the > disco#info replies, caps caching should be ok.
But if your client does not support GPG because it does not have the key, isn't that user specific. How do clients handle plugins? I mean many clients support plugins. If we both have the same clients with the same version but I have a plugin installed with a feature you do not have, how does caps caching work? Or are plugins added to the ver hash? Dirk -- Beta. Software undergoes beta testing shortly before it's released. Beta is Latin for 'still doesn't work.'
