On Mon Sep 1 23:13:08 2008, Pavel Simerda wrote:
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 20:47:47 +0200
Dirk Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > Dirk Meyer wrote:
> >> Peter wants to give XEP-0189 more love, I guess this is
something
> >> that should be in it. Also the user/client keys. When he is
back I
> >> can work with him to add all that stuff.
> >
> > Sure, let's do that. Or feel free to pull the XML out of SVN and
> > start working on it. :)
>
> I just looked at it and PEP and some other XEPs and there are some
> things I do not like. Maybe these XEPs need a small update for
this
> use-case.
>
> 1. PEP says the last_item should only be send if the priority is
not
> negative. But all bots have a negative priority and will never
get
> the updates. Maybe an extra config option for PubSub/PEP: also
send
> to negative priority?
http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0060.html#filtered-notifications
No priority in PubSub.
In PEP:
"If a subscriber subscribed using a bare JID <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and
a PEP service has appropriate presence information about the
subscriber, the PEP service MUST send one notification to the full
JID
(<[EMAIL PROTECTED]/resource> or <domain.tld/resource>) of each
of
the subscriber's available resources that have specified
non-negative
presence priority and included XEP-0115 information that indicates
an
interest in the data format."
I believe that if some resource indicates an interest, it should get
what it wants.
+1 for a change in the XEP
> 2. I like the fact that I get a notification when I start my
client
> when there is a new item (if it is configured that way). But I
also
> want to be notified when something was deleted (certificate
> revoked). What I would like to have is that I get a
notification
> from the server that "something has changed since I was last
> online" so I can get the whole tree of certificates.
You should not need to watch deleted item. Certificates are revoked,
not deleted, revocation could be just easily announced as a new
item.
> Maybe move that discussion to the pubsub list? /me needs to
subscribe
> to that list, too :)
Maybe, I'm not sure.
I'm sure. Copied. :-)
I (or someone) will report back with whatever it was that ended up
being decided; in the meantime, assume that from a protocol
perspective, we'll find a solution.
Dave.
--
Dave Cridland - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
- http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
