Dave Cridland wrote: > TLS has one defined, and we also have SASL, which we can't use for > much the same reasons, annoyingly. It's not too bad, though, we do > always have a signalling layer available, at least. > > So, you're thinking of something like: [...]
Something similar. I;m not a security expect and found a nice solution doing a 5 way handshake. Not perfect, I know. But I would prefer something people know what they are doing designed. :) Dirk -- May your life be like toilet paper - long and useful.
