On 5/10/10 12:20 PM, Mason, Matt wrote: > Greetings – > > > > I have reading the draft SCRAM > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-newman-auth-scram-13#page-7> which > apparently has expired.
It has been approved for publication as an RFC and is currently in the RFC Editor Queue: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sasl-scram/ > Is there a sample implementation of the SCRAM > algorithm somewhere? There are a few. Didn't we have a thread about that on another list recently? > Is the XMPP community still thinking that SCRAM > provides the best protection for authentication? Yes, it will be mandatory-to-implement in the RFC that results from draft-ietf-xmpp-3920bis (working group last call soon). Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
