Em Sex, 2010-01-22 às 20:15 +0300, Ivan Shcheklein escreveu: > 1. Why do you think that everyone must link with dynamic library? I > believe we should provide both versions.
Alright, there's no reason for not providing both... > 2. SEDNA_VERSION is NOT the same as dynamic library version. You > should define LIBRARY_VERSION variable. It's connected with current > version of the client/server protocol used in library (3 at present). That's ok, for sure. I'll change it... > 3. We can't link with readline because licenses are not compatible. What is the alternative? I added readline because the build was failing... daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Sedna-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sedna-discussion
