Hi, thanks Alan At 06:54 p.m. 07/01/00 -0600, you wrote: ... >Without even looking, I would assume with a name like "webjump," we are >dealing with a redirection service and those are always problematic for >www2email gateway servers. yes, the name is missleading but webjump service it is just as you describe hypermart. This two services have one advantage (besides the easy URL -easy to remember, hard to get-), they accept use of CGI ...... > >Speaking of nightmares, one look at the source code of the above URL >can tell you that not only are accmailers going to have problems, but >so are the rest of us. Look what we find in the <META> tags of this >site: > ><meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0"> > >Egads! FrontPage. <Yech> > ><!--webbot bot="HTMLMarkup" startspan --> <!--webbot >bot="HTMLMarkup" endspan --> > >That looks like a Frontpage bot is writing his code for him. Tsk, tsk. yes, front page is very problematic. many beginners are not aware of its "special features" like the bots that need a special server capability many times they lack. > >However, my personal tastes duly and melodramatically noted, I had no >problems getting this page through a GetWeb server and would assume the >other servers would get the page fine. Neither Binky nor KFS (or better say WEBE) can get the page. These are the servers I use due to they are fast. I will try www4mail This page is basically just a >splash page with a big image that links to his main page. > >Alan (...who asks the question, "Does anyone REALLY ever bookmark a WWW >splash page?) Appart from "decoration" the only reasons I read about for the use of a splash page are some promotion or search engine position techniques - which I do not think is the case with this URL- and language and browser choices. P.S.: both <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> failed to get the page. Which getweb did you use Alan?. Thanks
