Hi Sergio - 

I have done a fair bit of frequency-domain modelling in Maxwell, and I have 
always used the inphase and quadrature data.  By my reading of the 
documentation, the Maxwell FEM file format does not support apparent 
resistivity for plate modelling.

Greg has given a good summary of the two main algorithms used to calculate 
apparent resistivity [pseudolayer (inphase-quadrature) and amplitude-altitude]. 
 There is also a good article by Nick Valleau in Exploration Geophysics (2000), 
v31 pp 584-594.  You will need the altimeter data and the pseudolayer depth (if 
the former algorithm was used) to recover the inphase and quadrature from the 
apparent resistivity.  If the pseudolayer method was used and you don't have 
altimeter data, you might be able to assume a nominal altitude and see what you 
get.  I hope I am not going to provoke a storm of controversy here, but I think 
for plate modelling the anomaly shape is more important than the absolute 
amplitude.  If your anomalies are local, and the altimeter variations can be 
assumed to be minor over the width of the anomaly, then you might be able to 
get something useable.

In terms of highly-conductive regolith, it is rare to come across an airborne 
EM survey in Australia where the maximum conductivity is not ~1 S/m or higher.  
I am currently working on some data from Western Australia where the 
unconsolidated sediments have conductivity ~ 10 S/m... the maximum water 
salinities are on the order of 150,000 ppm.   These high conductivities have 
greatly limited the application of airborne FEM for mineral exploration in 
Australia, as the minimum frequency available is quite high (typically ~400 
Hz).  Of course there are many places in Australia where the cover is so thick 
and conductive that time-domain AEM doesn't cut it either, even with the very 
low base frequencies now available (12.5 Hz or 6.25 Hz).

Cheers,

James


-----Original Message-----
From: SEGMIN <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Bill Peters via 
SEGMIN
Sent: Monday, 23 November 2020 8:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Bill Peters <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [SEGMIN] SEGMIN Digest, Vol 29, Issue 26

  This message originated outside Mira Geoscience.

Absolutely no need for an apology Greg. It was said in good humour and that how 
we take it.

You are correct in my opinion that we have long favoured TDEM over FDEM here 
mainly because of our highly conductive regolith. In Canada you don't have that 
problem in general.

Cheers

Bill Peters                                      39 Richardson Street, West 
Perth WA 6005
SGC CHAIRMAN                            T +61 (8) 6254 5000     M +61 419 962 
274
CONSULTANT GEOPHYSICIST     E [email protected]        S   billpeters
Crosmin Pty Ltd
SOUTHERN GEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS   www.sgc.com.au

-----Original Message-----
From: SEGMIN On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: 23 November, 2020 1:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: SEGMIN Digest, Vol 29, Issue 26




Today's Topics:

   1. Apology (Greg Hodges)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 16:55:14 +0000 (UTC)
From: Greg Hodges <[email protected]>
To: SEGMIN <[email protected]>
Subject: [SEGMIN] Apology
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

It has been suggested to me that my attempted tease at my Australian friends 
about FDEM was in poor taste.? I agree, and I apologize for it.
I have tremendous respect for the EM science developed in Australia, and have 
gotten incalculable value from the EM modelling software developed there.?
Greg Hodges
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/private/segmin/attachments/20201122/721298bb/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

-----------------------
SEGMIN community mailing list service ([email protected]).
Change your personal options here: %(user_optionsurl)s Colleagues can join 
here: https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/segmin
Archives: https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/private/segmin/
NOTE that <Reply> will reply to all members of the list.


------------------------------

End of SEGMIN Digest, Vol 29, Issue 26
**************************************
-----------------------
SEGMIN community mailing list service ([email protected]).
Change your personal options here: 
https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/options/segmin/jamesr%40mirageoscience.com
Colleagues can join here: https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/segmin
Archives: https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/private/segmin/
NOTE that <Reply> will reply to all members of the list.
-----------------------
SEGMIN community mailing list service ([email protected]).
Change your personal options here: 
https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/options/segmin/archive%40mail-archive.com
Colleagues can join here: https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/segmin
Archives: https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/private/segmin/
NOTE that <Reply> will reply to all members of the list.

Reply via email to