Andreas Kuckartz: > In these two issues the maintainers seem to explicitly dislike the > "restorecon"-solution. > > Perhaps they are more interested in the best way of doing things? > > I suppose that rpm-based distributions using SELinux had to solve > similar issues.
Yesterday I searched a bit for further information and found these mails/threads: Possible issues with dpkg SELinux support https://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2012/11/msg00004.html [PATCH RFC] Package script(let)s SELinux execution context https://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2012/11/msg00013.html [PATCH] libselinux: Refactor rpm_execcon() into a new setexecfilecon() https://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2012/11/msg00014.html Guillem, have these patches been applied? Are you aware of any open issues regarding dpkg and SELinux? Background is https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SELinux Cheers, Andreas _______________________________________________ SELinux-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/selinux-devel
