On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:49:15 AM Laurent Bigonville wrote: > Package: selinux-basics > Followup-For: Bug #796693 > > I'm planning to kill the selinux-basics LSB initscript entirely and > remove all functionalities from the selinux-basic package. I'm planning > to keep selinux-basics as just a metapackage (with maybe the scripts to > easily enable selinux on debian). > > I'll move the relabeling functions to the policycoreutils package and use > the same logic that fedora is using (debian-selinux-autorelabel.service > and debian-selinux-autorelabel-mark.service plus a > debian-selinux-autorelabel LSB initscript).
Why are you planning to merge it with policycoreutils? Is the functionality in question in policycoreutils upstream? I don't have any real objection to such changes, but I would like to know what the benefits are. If there's code we can copy from Fedora then that's great! As an aside I uploaded a new version of selinux-basics ~6 hours ago to fix the umount issue. For some reason my uploads seem to be taking ages to get processed. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/ _______________________________________________ SELinux-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/selinux-devel
