Your message dated Sun, 20 Sep 2015 15:40:24 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#542907: fixed in selinux-basics 0.5.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #542907,
regarding selinux-basics: Need more init.d script dependencies?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
542907: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542907
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package:  selinux-basics
Version:  0.2.4
Severity: normal
User:     [email protected]
Usertags: incorrect-dependency

With dependency based boot sequencing, I discovered what I believe is
a bug in the init.d script.  The init.d script dependency information
state that it should run after checkfs, but not what it should run
before:

  ### BEGIN INIT INFO
  # Provides:          selinux-basics
  # Required-Start:    checkfs
  # Required-Stop:
  # Default-Start:     S
  # Default-Stop:
  # Short-Description: Basic SELinux management
  # Description:       Prepare system for SELinux usage, e.g. relabeling the fs.
  ### END INIT INFO

Does it matter?  In #537394 I discovered that it is placed in parallel
with mountall.sh and just after checkfs and before
mountall-bootclean.sh.  This seemed rather strange do me.  Then there
is this changelog entry in version 0.2.4:

  * Move initscript to S 36, just after all filesystems have been mounted

First of all, S36 was after mountall.sh, while all file systems are
only guaranteed to be mounted after mountnfs.sh.  I must admit I do
not understand what the script is doing, so I am not sure if it should
run before any file system related operations or not.  If it should
run after all file systems are available, it might be better to let it
depend on $remote_fs.  If it need to run before some other scripts in
rcS.d/, these should be listed in an X-Start-Before header.

Just thought it best to ask, now that dependency based boot sequencing
is the default.

<URL: 
http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_2.1.0/LSB-generic/LSB-generic/initscrcomconv.html
 >
documents the LSB header format.  Some debian notes are available from
<URL: http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts >.

Happy hacking,
-- 
Petter Reinholdtsen



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: selinux-basics
Source-Version: 0.5.3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
selinux-basics, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Laurent Bigonville <[email protected]> (supplier of updated selinux-basics 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 15:54:34 +0200
Source: selinux-basics
Binary: selinux-basics
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.5.3
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian SELinux maintainers <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Laurent Bigonville <[email protected]>
Description:
 selinux-basics - SELinux basic support
Closes: 542907 569698 727305 796693
Changes:
 selinux-basics (0.5.3) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * Drop the selinux-basics initscript, this package is not responsible
     anymore for relabeling the filesystem on boot. Please see new
     policycoreutils (>= 2.4) version. (Closes: #569698, #542907, #796693,
     #727305)
   * check-selinux-installation: Switch to python3
   * debian/compat: Bump compat version to 9
   * debian/control: Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6 (no further changes)
   * selinux-activate: Do not modify the kdm pam service anymore, latest
     version of the kdm package is properly calling pam_selinux already.
   * selinux-activate: Expect selinuxfs to be mounted under /sys/fs/selinux
   * debian/control: Add dh-python to the Build-Depends
   * debian/control: Add ${perl:Depends} to the dependency list
   * debian/control: Add policycoreutils-python-utils to the Recommends
Checksums-Sha1:
 4b4860503fb93f7e1ec945a1f852e0efd8bec1c8 1346 selinux-basics_0.5.3.dsc
 c0ff71d8b9675e4a63ec81e94841659c9b19012e 10360 selinux-basics_0.5.3.tar.xz
 2d622613fd8abb8d06f36cdbb5cfa517ec10a3be 14406 selinux-basics_0.5.3_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 b02ab26dd7f9133d45aa5a645f91bc0ce0588bbb44540d1dabc9f3548f0ec0d5 1346 
selinux-basics_0.5.3.dsc
 ea16df927ec726b71617ba5808f67c1fa5ddfb25999ebbe2a84a81486615d7e9 10360 
selinux-basics_0.5.3.tar.xz
 27c98d59092155aef4782c7fc8d161346febd29c844ebc8378c2f61d58d8b2c7 14406 
selinux-basics_0.5.3_all.deb
Files:
 2b90a1080afdf6c6f889f306c32c37e8 1346 admin optional selinux-basics_0.5.3.dsc
 52e8c8cff7f9fc037d40b44c6d098574 10360 admin optional 
selinux-basics_0.5.3.tar.xz
 42e3875deed89c79e9362e63b6b0f960 14406 admin optional 
selinux-basics_0.5.3_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV/rtzAAoJEB/FiR66sEPVd1AH/2tCIA92eHb+5uRrEGUkymt2
PC4EGhe3NUWxj8jxjmm2BxF38/fa1U7gbCsRfUU7meYLoLWvsAKAJNbmWHI5AZv+
Pf5ORp4KNxo1sv2AEG44PDpSS3/TU8aZBOQWRMvA3aBl2gd3oJbmt+pdjBzYdwwf
DjB+aCpLMBVTEn56T5x719gOUjV7YxoqU5TJjKfQ0CftDnfwgjCjA0NmjGhp++vQ
cLNmxkj7EUraGMhWmBYQB3GWImNQdDcE73khIhPa3Zm3lKWG3BjqLag/FVDRLIIv
47VkITlPnaIitkI9zUpacRWVoIoUKf88JPtcAPwRKssBNVS60qQNH23kBsEz0IE=
=o5Ks
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
SELinux-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/selinux-devel

Reply via email to