On 6/30/2016 3:17 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Dan Jurgens <dani...@mellanox.com> wrote:
>> From: Daniel Jurgens <dani...@mellanox.com>
>>
>> Support for Infiniband requires the addition of two new object contexts,
>> one for infiniband PKeys and another IB End Ports. Added handlers to read
>> and write the new ocontext types when reading or writing a binary policy
>> representation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <dani...@mellanox.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Eli Cohen <e...@mellanox.com>
>> ---
>> security/selinux/include/security.h | 3 +-
>> security/selinux/ss/policydb.c | 129
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> security/selinux/ss/policydb.h | 27 +++++---
>> 3 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c
>> index 992a315..78b819c 100644
>> --- a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c
>> +++ b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c
>> @@ -2219,6 +2229,58 @@ static int ocontext_read(struct policydb *p, struct
>> policydb_compat_info *info,
>> goto out;
>> break;
>> }
>> + case OCON_PKEY: {
>> + rc = next_entry(nodebuf, fp, sizeof(u32) *
>> 6);
>> + if (rc)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + c->u.pkey.subnet_prefix =
>> be64_to_cpu(*((__be64 *)nodebuf));
>> + /* The subnet prefix is stored as an IPv6
>> + * address in the policy.
>> + *
>> + * Check that the lower 2 DWORDS are 0.
>> + */
> Any particular reason why you reusing an IPv6 address format here?
> Why not use a u64 for the prefix and u16/u32 fields for the partition
> keys?
The subnet prefix is the high order bytes of an IPv6 address and there is
infrastructure in place in the userland utilities that deal with IPv6 addresses
(parsing them with a :: to eliminate the need to fill out the 0's for example).
Regarding u16, the policy is packed with everything in u32, as you can see in
OCON_NODE6 and OCON_PORT handling.
>> + if (nodebuf[2] || nodebuf[3]) {
>> + rc = -EINVAL;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (nodebuf[4] > 0xffff ||
>> + nodebuf[5] > 0xffff) {
>> + rc = -EINVAL;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + c->u.pkey.low_pkey = le32_to_cpu(nodebuf[4]);
>> + c->u.pkey.high_pkey =
>> le32_to_cpu(nodebuf[5]);
>> +
>> + rc =
>> context_read_and_validate(&c->context[0],
>> + p,
>> + fp);
>> + if (rc)
>> + goto out;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + case OCON_IB_END_PORT:
> This is a little bit of bikeshedding, but is there such thing as an IB
> "port" that isn't an *end* "port"? Could we simply use OCON_IB_PORT?
Jason Gunthorpe requested that the name be end_port in the RFC series.
>> + rc = next_entry(buf, fp, sizeof(u32) * 2);
>> + if (rc)
>> + goto out;
>> + len = le32_to_cpu(buf[0]);
>> +
>> + rc = str_read(&c->u.ib_end_port.dev_name,
>> GFP_KERNEL,
>> + fp,
>> + len);
>> + if (rc)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + c->u.ib_end_port.port = le32_to_cpu(buf[1]);
> No range checking on the port value like you do on the partition keys above?
I can add a similar check.
_______________________________________________
Selinux mailing list
Selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
To unsubscribe, send email to selinux-le...@tycho.nsa.gov.
To get help, send an email containing "help" to selinux-requ...@tycho.nsa.gov.
