On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Paul Moore <p...@paul-moore.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Daniel Jurgens <dani...@mellanox.com> wrote: >> On 5/3/2017 9:41 AM, Paul Moore wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Dan Jurgens <dani...@mellanox.com> wrote: >>>> From: Daniel Jurgens <dani...@mellanox.com> >>>> >>>> Infiniband applications access HW from user-space -- traffic is generated >>>> directly by HW, bypassing the kernel. Consequently, Infiniband Partitions, >>>> which are associated directly with HW transport endpoints, are a natural >>>> choice for enforcing granular mandatory access control for Infiniband. QPs >>>> may >>>> only send or receives packets tagged with the corresponding partition key >>>> (PKey). The PKey is not a cryptographic key; it's a 16 bit number >>>> identifying >>>> the partition ... >>>> >>> Hi Dan, >>> >>> I haven't heard anything from you in a while, where do things stand >>> with this effort? Unless I missed them, I believe we are still >>> waiting on the userspace, SELinux reference policy, and >>> selinux-testsuite patches. >>> >> Hi Paul, >> >> I got distracted for a while. I've just rebased the kernel and >> userspace. I'll do some testing and submit the userspace code in the next >> couple days. I still have to write the selinux-testsuite tests, I'll work >> on those concurrently with the userspace review cycle. > > Great, thanks for the update. We'll look forward to the patches.
I took a closer look at the patchset and I think it looks fine, coupled with the recent progress on the SELinux userspace and test suite I think it would be good to get this into the selinux/next tree so we can start playing with it. Dan, I know there were some IB merge conflicts with this patch could you do a respin against the current selinux/next tree? * git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/selinux * http://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/selinux Thanks. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com