On 7/3/2017 6:03 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Dan Jurgens <dani...@mellanox.com> wrote:
>> From: Daniel Jurgens <dani...@mellanox.com>
>>
>> ib_get_cached_subnet_prefix can technically fail, but the only way it
>> could is not possible based on the loop conditions. Check the return
>> value before using the variable sp to resolve a static analysis warning.
>>
>> Fixes: 8f408ab64be6 ("selinux lsm IB/core: Implement LSM notification
>> system")
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <dani...@mellanox.com>
>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/infiniband/core/device.c | 3 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c 
>> b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
>> index 631eaa9..dabd9f9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
>> @@ -376,7 +376,8 @@ static void ib_policy_change_task(struct work_struct 
>> *work)
>>                         WARN_ONCE(ret,
>>                                   "ib_get_cached_subnet_prefix err: %d, this 
>> should never happen here\n",
>>                                   ret);
>> -                       ib_security_cache_change(dev, i, sp);
>> +                       if (ret)
> Should this be "if (!ret)"?

Yes, my apologies. I missed the git add after fixing that locally.  I sent v1 a 
minute ago.
>
>> +                               ib_security_cache_change(dev, i, sp);
>>                 }
>>         }
>>         up_read(&lists_rwsem);


Reply via email to