On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 15:19 +0100, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
> When a calling process uses umask(0) some files in the SELinux module
> store can be created to be world writeable. With this patch,
> libsemanage
> sets umask(0077) before fopen() operations and restores the original
> umask value when it's done.
>
> Fixes:
> drwx------. /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active
> -rw-rw-rw-. /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/booleans.local
> -rw-rw-rw-. /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/policy.linked
> -rw-rw-rw-. /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/seusers.local
>
> drwx------.
> /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/modules/400/permissive_sshd_t
> -rw-rw-rw-.
> /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/modules/400/permissive_sshd_t/cil
> -rw-rw-rw-.
> /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/modules/400/permissive_sshd_t/lang_e
> xt
> drwx------. /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/modules/disabled
> -rw-rw-rw-.
> /var/lib/selinux/targeted/active/modules/disabled/zosremote
>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Lautrbach <[email protected]>
> ---
> libsemanage/src/database_file.c | 3 +++
> libsemanage/src/direct_api.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> libsemanage/src/semanage_store.c | 4 ++++
> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/libsemanage/src/database_file.c
> b/libsemanage/src/database_file.c
> index a21b3eeb..d0172e73 100644
> --- a/libsemanage/src/database_file.c
> +++ b/libsemanage/src/database_file.c
> @@ -119,13 +119,16 @@ static int dbase_file_flush(semanage_handle_t *
> handle, dbase_file_t * dbase)
> cache_entry_t *ptr;
> const char *fname = NULL;
> FILE *str = NULL;
> + mode_t mask = 0;
Why do we need to initialize this here?
>
> if (!dbase_llist_is_modified(&dbase->llist))
> return STATUS_SUCCESS;
>
> fname = dbase->path[handle->is_in_transaction];
>
> + mask = umask(0077);
> str = fopen(fname, "w");
> + umask(mask);
> if (!str) {
> ERR(handle, "could not open %s for writing: %s",
> fname, strerror(errno));
> diff --git a/libsemanage/src/direct_api.c
> b/libsemanage/src/direct_api.c
> index 00ad8201..46072f92 100644
> --- a/libsemanage/src/direct_api.c
> +++ b/libsemanage/src/direct_api.c
> @@ -1176,6 +1176,7 @@ static int
> semanage_direct_commit(semanage_handle_t * sh)
> sepol_policydb_t *out = NULL;
> struct cil_db *cildb = NULL;
> semanage_module_info_t *modinfos = NULL;
> + mode_t mask = 0;
Why do we need to initialize mask here?
>
> int do_rebuild, do_write_kernel, do_install;
> int fcontexts_modified, ports_modified, seusers_modified,
> @@ -1212,6 +1213,8 @@ static int
> semanage_direct_commit(semanage_handle_t * sh)
> /* Rebuild if explicitly requested or any module changes
> occurred. */
> do_rebuild = sh->do_rebuild | sh->modules_modified;
>
> + mask = umask(0077);
> +
> /* Create or remove the disable_dontaudit flag file. */
> path = semanage_path(SEMANAGE_TMP,
> SEMANAGE_DISABLE_DONTAUDIT);
> if (access(path, F_OK) == 0)
> @@ -1645,6 +1648,10 @@ cleanup:
> semanage_remove_directory(semanage_final_path
> (SEMANAGE_FINAL_TMP,
> SEMANAGE_FINAL_TOPLEVEL));
> + if (mask) {
> + umask(mask);
> + }
Why is this conditional?
> +
> return retval;
> }
>
> @@ -2016,6 +2023,7 @@ static int
> semanage_direct_set_enabled(semanage_handle_t *sh,
> const char *path = NULL;
> FILE *fp = NULL;
> semanage_module_info_t *modinfo = NULL;
> + mode_t mask = 0;
Ditto
>
> /* check transaction */
> if (!sh->is_in_transaction) {
> @@ -2076,7 +2084,9 @@ static int
> semanage_direct_set_enabled(semanage_handle_t *sh,
>
> switch (enabled) {
> case 0: /* disable the module */
> + mask = umask(0077);
> fp = fopen(fn, "w");
> + umask(mask);
>
> if (fp == NULL) {
> ERR(sh,
> @@ -2722,7 +2732,9 @@ static int
> semanage_direct_install_info(semanage_handle_t *sh,
> int type;
>
> char path[PATH_MAX];
> + mode_t mask = 0;
No need to initialize this here.
>
> + mask = umask(0077);
And this should go after local variable declarations or get folded into
the declaration above.
> semanage_module_info_t *higher_info = NULL;
> semanage_module_key_t higher_key;
> ret = semanage_module_key_init(sh, &higher_key);
> @@ -2834,6 +2846,9 @@ cleanup:
> semanage_module_info_destroy(sh, higher_info);
> free(higher_info);
>
> + if (mask) {
> + umask(mask);
> + }
Why conditional?
> return status;
> }
>
> diff --git a/libsemanage/src/semanage_store.c
> b/libsemanage/src/semanage_store.c
> index 63c80b04..74fbb677 100644
> --- a/libsemanage/src/semanage_store.c
> +++ b/libsemanage/src/semanage_store.c
> @@ -2099,11 +2099,13 @@ int semanage_write_policydb(semanage_handle_t
> * sh, sepol_policydb_t * out,
> const char *kernel_filename = NULL;
> struct sepol_policy_file *pf = NULL;
> FILE *outfile = NULL;
> + mode_t mask = 0;
>
> if ((kernel_filename =
> semanage_path(SEMANAGE_TMP, file)) == NULL) {
> goto cleanup;
> }
> + mask = umask(0077);
Just move this before the first goto cleanup and then you don't need to
initialize mask or make the test below conditional.
> if ((outfile = fopen(kernel_filename, "wb")) == NULL) {
> ERR(sh, "Could not open kernel policy %s for
> writing.",
> kernel_filename);
> @@ -2127,6 +2129,8 @@ int semanage_write_policydb(semanage_handle_t *
> sh, sepol_policydb_t * out,
> if (outfile != NULL) {
> fclose(outfile);
> }
> + if (mask != 0)
> + umask(mask);
> sepol_policy_file_free(pf);
> return retval;
> }
