On Thu, 4 Oct 2018, Jann Horn wrote: > > Well, we can't really call out into audit from scheduler code, and the > > previous versions of the patchsets didn't have PTRACE_MODE_SCHED, so it > > had to be included in PTRACE_MODE_IBPB in order to make sure we're not > > calling into audit from context switch code. > > > > Or did I misunderstand the question? > > If I understand Casey correctly, he is saying that your patch > (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/) > doesn't include PTRACE_MODE_NOAUDIT for IBPB, but the previous v6 of > your patch > (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/) > did include it, and therefore Casey thinks that there is a specific > reason why you removed PTRACE_MODE_NOAUDIT,
Quite honestly, I don't remember. I dont't think there is any deadlock that'd be triggered by this. > and therefore Casey is adding special-case logic for PTRACE_MODE_SCHED > to Smack when simply using PTRACE_MODE_NOAUDIT would also work. > > I think that Casey should change ptrace_may_access_sched() to use > "mode | PTRACE_MODE_SCHED | PTRACE_MODE_NOAUDIT". Agreed, that should work. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs _______________________________________________ Selinux mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]. To get help, send an email containing "help" to [email protected].
