Thanks, am looking into the logistics. Can use of concepts also help provide 
items for a list or radio buttons, or is that functionality solely tied to 
properties?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Yaron Koren
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 3:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Semantic Forms] Re: Compound autocomplete options?

You can create a "concept" for the intersection of those two categories, and 
then autocomplete the field on that concept.

-Yaron
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Marc Feickert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>> wrote:


Is it somehow possible to use more than one autocomplete option for a form
field? We have the need for users to be able to tag certain pages with more
than one category. I want to autocomplete on the Category namespace but only
for pages that are tagged with a certain category.
{{{field|located_in_level_2|mandatory|autocomplete on category=Level 2
Jurisdictions|autocomplete on namespace=Category}}}

I know that the code I pasted above does not work. Any ideas how to
accomplish the goal at hand?


--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Compound-autocomplete-options--tp20214304p20214304.html
Sent from the Semantic Forms mailing list archive at Nabble.com.





----------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and 
may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, 
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of 
the original message.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Semantic Forms" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/semantic-forms?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to