If no information has been provided for fields that are for-template, then it seems reasonable that the form author should be able to choose whether SF generates a stub template transclusion or not. It can be difficult for a template to determine whether conditions exist to apply a category or not, so I think it may be better to have that decision made in the form itself.
In a similar vein, it would be handy to specify that the default value for a field is to be ignored in the event that no other fields for a template have been provided. In other words, it may be useful to discuss a few use cases involving the default attribute. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Semantic Forms" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/semantic-forms?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
