If any testing is going to occur between SMW and SRF I think it'd be useful
to adopt the X.X.1 numbering scheme you describe. That would at least
partially decouple srf releases from smw releases while still indicating
compatibility.
On Oct 22, 2008 6:32 AM, "Denny Vrandečić" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I just discussed this idea with Yaron, and he thinks that it may be not
so good an idea to synch the version numbers. So the idea was to have a
release out after every SMW release, which would use the same number as
the SMW release.
In-between releases of SRF would have the numbering scheme X.X.1, X.X.2
etc., with X.X being the SMW release this release is compatible to. It
may be that SRF 1.5.3 will be compatible with SMW 1.4, but this will be
written explicitly in the documentation.
The other option is to have completely detached version numbers of SRF,
i.e. start with 1.0 soon, and then move on, unaffected from SMW
releases. This way, major changes can have a major version jump, etc.
The versioning then reflects better what really happens with SRF instead
of synching with SMW.
Does anyone have an opinion on this?
Cheers,
denny
Denny Vrandečić wrote: > Not by design, it just has not been added yet. The
plan is to release a > ...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
