Hey, I am rather unhappy that the volunteer nature of the work keeps being brought up as a reply to the release process not being good. Yes, you cannot reasonably demand that a volunteer invests more of their time, or that they spend it in a certain way. The issue here is a poor release process, which in my view is quite orthogonal.
There are also many stakeholders beyond James that are affected, and they are not irrelevant. Most noticeably the users of the software, which are not getting access to long developed features. There are also the other people that contribute to the software. Speaking for myself, I am not enthusiastic at all to contribute to a project if it is not clear my improvements will see the light of day in a reasonable time frame, and things I previously contributed have been sitting in the dark for over a year. Such a situation is also not appealing to potential contributors. Some time ago I started work on adding visual editing to the Maps extension, to be released as version 6.0. At some point I ran out of time having gotten only part of the way there. As there was already useful functionality added, I decided to just release that rather than potentially keeping it unavailable for months. So the users win. And contributors to Maps know that their contributions are likely to be released within a week or two. The same could have been done for SMW 3.0 long ago. Instead, new features have kept being added to the milestone. Now if James does not want to spend time on doing a release that is his decision. Should it also be his decision to block any release form happening because he is the primary contributor, even if that throws all other stakeholders under the buss? I don't think so. And yes, that is what is happening. I have offered spending time on doing a 3.0 release in the past, always getting a "you can't do this and don't rush me" type of reply. Cheers -- Jeroen De Dauw | https://entropywins.wtf | https://keybase.io/jeroendedauw Software Crafter | Speaker | Student | Strategist | Contributor to Wikimedia and Open Source ~=[,,_,,]:3
_______________________________________________ Semediawiki-devel mailing list Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
