o Alex Balashov [11/18/2009 04:43 PM]:
Can you enlighten me as to why sw_prepaid_sip is a better base for this
than ann_b2b?
feels like i am repeating myself... because this is for the case that
the INVITE is relayed and not answered with 200 later etc (the
transaction is put into the uas trans list, or not, or something like
that, see the code for the flag "relayed invite"). this is also possible
with ivr (the python one), with the flag "relayed invite".
Stefan
Thanks Stefan!
--
Sent from mobile device
On Nov 18, 2009, at 10:37 AM, Stefan Sayer <[email protected]> wrote:
o Raphael Coeffic [11/18/2009 02:00 PM]:
No funny signaling manipulation, no remapping of reply codes, no
special stateful chicanery.
Then I would say that your idea with the slated ann_b2b example might
work properly, if you remove anything related to audio and the 183
reply.
no, as i said, ann_b2b is not the right one to start with. use
sw_prepaid_sip for that (for relayed invite).
just copy the directory, edit module name in makefile, and remove the
prepaid stuff from it.
Stefan
--
Stefan Sayer
VoIP Services
[email protected]
www.iptego.com
IPTEGO GmbH
Wittenbergplatz 1
10789 Berlin
Germany
Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 101010
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alexander Hoffmann
_______________________________________________
Sems mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/sems
--
Stefan Sayer
VoIP Services
[email protected]
www.iptego.com
IPTEGO GmbH
Wittenbergplatz 1
10789 Berlin
Germany
Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 101010
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alexander Hoffmann
_______________________________________________
Sems mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/sems
