Are you going to fix this bug?
Two weeks have pasted and nothing has been done to fix this bug.

Best regards,
Alex Gradinar

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alex Gradinar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Raphael Coeffic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Semsdev] SipCtrlInterface & Content-Type:application/dtmf-relay


Hi, Raphael,

You are right.
I've done a new patch.
SipCtrlInterface::handle_sip_request sets req.content_type.
AmSession::onSipRequest uses req.content_type if req.content_type is set,
if not it uses req.hdrs.

And I think AmSession::onSipRequest should reply error if 
content_type!="application/dtmf-relay" to avoid retransmission.

Best regards,
Alex Gradinar


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Raphael Coeffic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alex Gradinar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Semsdev] SipCtrlInterface & Content-Type:application/dtmf-relay


> Hi Alex,
> 
> thanks for your patch. Actually, i tried to move this item to 
> [req|reply].content_type, to avoid everybody parsing this item each 
> time, whereby it is already parsed. So i think that the correct fix 
> would be that onSipRequest first checks it the content-type is set in 
> the right field. If not, then it could parse the hdrs field as usual.
> 
> Unfortunatly, i noticed that the new field is far from being used 
> everywhere... So we may need to check some more places where this should 
> be also changed.
> 
> Cheers
> Raphael.
> 
> Alex Gradinar wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've found a bug in the latest trunk of sems.
>> If DTMF is sent with SIP message INFO the sems doesn't corretly process SIP 
>> message.
>> Because in AmSession::onSipRequest it tries to get "Content-Type" header 
>> from req.hdrs,
>> but SipCtrlInterface doesn't add "Content-Type" header  to req.hdrs in 
>> SipCtrlInterface::handle_sip_request.
>>
>> I've fixed it... see my path
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Alex Gradinar
>>   
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Semsdev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev
>>   
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Semsdev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> _______________________________________________
> Semsdev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev
>
_______________________________________________
Semsdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev

Reply via email to