o Raphael Coeffic [06/03/08 19:09]: > Houston.... we have a problem! > > So here is the issue for which i am looking for a solution: > > Let's SEMS sends an INVITE out for which it receives a 100 or 183 very > quickly. Now the transaction state is switched to "Proceeding". The > issue is that the RFC does not specify any timer for this state. So, if > the UAS on the other never send a final reply, we will wait for ever... > > So the question is: should it be useful to let the application choose > how long it would wait for a final reply? And if a each 1xx reply would
like ser's fr_inv_timer? Stefan -- Stefan Sayer VoIP Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.iptego.com iptego GmbH Am Borsigturm 40 13507 Berlin Germany Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 101010 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alexander Hoffmann _______________________________________________ Semsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev
