Hi Raphael, even though the comment had been wrong before (2 us, not ms), I am not sure whether I would change this without testing the accuracy of the timer in high load situations. With the current value I have seen quite good accuracy, what were your results with the value of 2ms?
Stefan o [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06/04/08 10:21]: > Author: rco > Date: 2008-06-04 10:21:07 +0200 (Wed, 04 Jun 2008) > New Revision: 1004 > > Modified: > branches/1.0.0/core/AmMediaProcessor.cpp > Log: > - fixed minor bug. (trunk 1002:1003) > > > Modified: branches/1.0.0/core/AmMediaProcessor.cpp > =================================================================== > --- branches/1.0.0/core/AmMediaProcessor.cpp 2008-06-04 08:19:31 UTC (rev > 1003) > +++ branches/1.0.0/core/AmMediaProcessor.cpp 2008-06-04 08:21:07 UTC (rev > 1004) > @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ > sdiff.tv_sec = diff.tv_sec; > sdiff.tv_nsec = diff.tv_usec * 1000; > > - if(sdiff.tv_nsec > 2000) // 2 ms > + if(sdiff.tv_nsec > 2000000) // 2 ms > nanosleep(&sdiff,&rem); > } > > > _______________________________________________ > Semsdev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev -- Stefan Sayer VoIP Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.iptego.com iptego GmbH Am Borsigturm 40 13507 Berlin Germany Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 101010 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alexander Hoffmann _______________________________________________ Semsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev
