Hi all,

Personally I don't like auto* tools either.  The tool set is difficult 
to understand and users/developers just don't know what to run at what 
stage (libtool, aclocal, automake, autoconf, configure, autoreconf, 
autoheader etc...).  Honestly I tried to learn and use the tool set at 
some point, but I just gave up after a few failed attempts.  I just 
couldn't understand the tool chain properly.

As for alternatives, there are quite a number of choices out there.  
While CMake seems to be gaining some share, bakefile is another choice 
(http://www.bakefile.org/index.html).  I haven't used it before, so 
really not sure whether it's good in practice or not.  Anyway, just 
throwing out the name as an option.



Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All!
>
> 2008/10/15 Stefan Sayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>   
>> Hello,
>>
>> in the past we have spent way too much time maintaining the Makefiles,
>> and this also in a quite improper way. So I started adding cmake [1]
>> lists to have proper Makefiles (or other build system files) generated
>> by cmake. For now it is only the core and wav.so, but its a start...
>>     
>
> Good news. The former (and present) buildsystem is hard-to-maintain
> (at least I think so) and hard-to-understand one.
>
>   
>> Having played around with autoconf&automake, I'd say it is for my taste
>> just too complex to use it properly, and also I personally do not see
>> much advantage in libtool, but if anyone is more experienced with that
>> and likes to contribute something I would be happy as well. BTW if you
>> haven't read [2] its imo a good laugh...
>>
>> Stefan
>>
>> [1] http://www.cmake.org/
>> [2] http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/889/
>>     
>
> Ther is also a flamewar about buildsystems in Fedora-Devel maillist
> right now. I dig it a little and found another one pretty interesting
> message about autotools:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/94116/focus=94451
>
> Just FYI.
>
>   

_______________________________________________
Semsdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev

Reply via email to