Hi Robert,
Thanks for the patch!
As you pointed out, waiting in an event handler does block the event
queue, which seems obvious. This also means that waiting in an event
handler is not really the way it should be implemented, except for very
few things.
Moreover, Stefan has made some plans to use a threadpool for the session
event loop, instead of having one thread per session. This increases the
performances dramatically when running signaling only applications. The
drawback is that the event loop becomes even more sensible, as blocking
in an event handler will also prevent other sessions from being processed.
So the crucial question is: how long do you wait there? If it is more
than a few 10s of milliseconds, you might run into troubles once we have
introduced the session threadpool.
With a little bit more explaination, we might be able to discuss a more
asynchronous / scalable solution to your issue.
Cheers
Raphael.
On 14.04.10 15:09, Robert Szokovacs wrote:
Hi,
I started using AmCondition and noticed it didn't wrap
pthread_cond_timedwait(). As I couldn't use UserTimer because I wait in
onInvite() so the timeout events don't get delivered, I added the
functionality to AmCondition. Patch attached.
br
Szo
_______________________________________________
Semsdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev
_______________________________________________
Semsdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev